Comparison of Transboundary Water Resources Allocation Models Based on Game Theory and Multi-Objective Optimization

Transboundary water resources allocation is an effective measure to resolve water-related conflicts. Aiming at the problem of conflicts, we constructed models based on game theory and multi-objective optimization, revealed differences between two models. We compare Pareto front solved by AR-MOEA method NSGA-II method, analyzed difference Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower model optimization model. The Huaihe River basin was selected as a case study. results show that: (1) better than in terms diversity metric (Δ); (2) solution asymmetric non-dominated solution, can obtain same scheme optimal under specific preference structure; (3) after obtains front, it still needs construct information for second time make decision, while directly one participating negotiation. expand provide support rational allocation.